All manuscripts submitted to Social Humaniora Journal undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and relevance to the social sciences and humanities. The peer-review process is designed to maintain the integrity of the publication and to support the dissemination of reliable and impactful research findings.

Upon submission, each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editorial team for compliance with the journal’s scope, formatting standards, and overall scholarly quality. Manuscripts meeting these preliminary criteria are then assigned to expert reviewers with specialized knowledge in the relevant field. Reviewers conduct a comprehensive assessment, considering the clarity of research objectives, appropriateness of methodology, validity and interpretation of results, depth of theoretical or conceptual analysis, and the significance of the contribution to social and humanistic knowledge.

Social Humaniora Journal employs a double-blind review system to ensure impartiality, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process. Reviewers provide detailed feedback, highlighting strengths, identifying areas for improvement, and recommending whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. Authors are expected to address reviewer comments thoughtfully and make necessary revisions to enhance the clarity, rigor, and scholarly impact of their work.

The editorial team makes the final decision based on reviewer recommendations and the overall merit of the manuscript. This rigorous peer-review procedure upholds high academic standards, promotes ethical scholarship, and ensures that published articles make a meaningful contribution to the advancement of social and humanistic research. By adhering to these processes, Social Humaniora Journal fosters trust, transparency, and credibility within the global academic community.