All manuscripts submitted to Information Communication and Technology Journal (ICT) undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and relevance to the fields of information and communication technology. The peer-review process is designed to maintain the integrity of the publication and to support the dissemination of reliable and impactful research findings in ICT.

Upon submission, each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editorial team for compliance with the journal’s scope, formatting standards, and overall scholarly quality. Manuscripts meeting these preliminary criteria are then assigned to expert reviewers with specialized knowledge in the relevant area of ICT. Reviewers conduct a comprehensive assessment, considering the clarity of research objectives, appropriateness of methodology, validity and interpretation of results, depth of theoretical or technical analysis, and the significance of the contribution to ICT knowledge and practice.

ICT Journal employs a double-blind review system to ensure impartiality, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process. Reviewers provide detailed feedback, highlighting strengths, identifying areas for improvement, and recommending whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. Authors are expected to address reviewer comments thoughtfully and make necessary revisions to enhance the clarity, rigor, and scholarly impact of their work.

The editorial team makes the final decision based on reviewer recommendations and the overall merit of the manuscript. This rigorous peer-review procedure upholds high academic standards, promotes ethical scholarship, and ensures that published articles make a meaningful contribution to the advancement of research, innovation, and knowledge in information and communication technology. By adhering to these processes, ICT Journal fosters trust, transparency, and credibility within the global academic and professional community.